Home/Indiana Court of Appeals/Winchester v. Continental Can Co.

Winchester v. Continental Can Co.

135 N.E. 266, 78 Ind. App. 699, 1922 Ind. App. LEXIS 178
CourtIndiana Court of Appeals
DecidedApril 27, 1922
DocketNo. 11,237
StatusPublished

This text of 135 N.E. 266 (Winchester v. Continental Can Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Winchester v. Continental Can Co., 135 N.E. 266, 78 Ind. App. 699, 1922 Ind. App. LEXIS 178 (Ind. Ct. App. 1922).

Opinion

Nichols, J.

— The judgment is affirmed upon the authority of Gray v. McLaughlin (1921), 191 Ind. 190, 131 N. E. 518, and of Rust v. Schwiening (1919), 72 Ind. App. 497, 124 N. E. 878.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gray v. McLaughlin
131 N.E. 518 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1921)
Rust v. Schwiening
124 N.E. 878 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1919)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
135 N.E. 266, 78 Ind. App. 699, 1922 Ind. App. LEXIS 178, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/winchester-v-continental-can-co-indctapp-1922.