Winchester v. Continental Can Co.

135 N.E. 266, 78 Ind. App. 699, 1922 Ind. App. LEXIS 178
Indiana Court of Appeals·Decided April 27, 1922·No. No. 11,237·Published

Opinion

Nichols, J.

— The judgment is affirmed upon the authority of Gray v. McLaughlin (1921), 191 Ind. 190, 131 N. E. 518, and of Rust v. Schwiening (1919), 72 Ind. App. 497, 124 N. E. 878.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Winchester v. Continental Can Co., 135 N.E. 266, 78 Ind. App. 699, 1922 Ind. App. LEXIS 178 (Ind. Ct. App. 1922).

135 N.E. 266 (Winchester v. Continental Can Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gray v. McLaughlin
131 N.E. 518 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1921)
Rust v. Schwiening
124 N.E. 878 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1919)