Winchester v. Browne

8 N.Y.S. 82, 27 N.Y. St. Rep. 361, 54 Hun 636, 1889 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2180
New York Supreme Court·Decided November 7, 1889·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Van Brunt, P. J.

The appeal taken herein is entirely without merit. The order of the general term, entered upon the appeal from the sufficiency of the surety upon the undertaking for costs offered by the plaintiff, clearly allowed the deposit of the money, instead of giving a new undertaking. The order appealed from should be affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Winchester v. Browne, 8 N.Y.S. 82, 27 N.Y. St. Rep. 361, 54 Hun 636, 1889 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2180 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1889).

8 N.Y.S. 82 (Winchester v. Browne) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kokomo Straw Board Co. v. Sachs
4 Silv. Sup. 150 (New York Supreme Court, 1889)