Winchester Global Trust Co. v. Donovan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Winchester Global Trust Co. v. Donovan

22 A.D.3d 747, 802 N.Y.S.2d 624

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 24, 2005

StatusPublished

This text of 22 A.D.3d 747 (Winchester Global Trust Co. v. Donovan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Winchester Global Trust Co. v. Donovan, 22 A.D.3d 747, 802 N.Y.S.2d 624 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

[748]*748In an action, inter alia, to set aside certain conveyances as fraudulent, the defendants appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Warshawsky, J.), entered April 7, 2005, as denied that branch of their motion which was to transfer venue to Suffolk County and granted that branch of the plaintiffs cross motion which was to retain venue in Nassau County.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court properly denied that branch of the defendants’ motion which was to transfer venue of this action to Suffolk County, and granted that branch of the plaintiffs cross motion which was to retain venue in Nassau County.

The defendants’ remaining contentions are either without merit or need not be reached in light of our determination. Florio, J.P., Crane, Ritter and Lifson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[748]*748In an action, inter alia, to set aside certain conveyances as fraudulent, the defendants appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Warshawsky, J.), entered April 7, 2005, as denied that branch of their motion which was to transfer venue to Suffolk County and granted that branch of the plaintiffs cross motion which was to retain venue in Nassau County.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court properly denied that branch of the defendants’ motion which was to transfer venue of this action to Suffolk County, and granted that branch of the plaintiffs cross motion which was to retain venue in Nassau County.

The defendants’ remaining contentions are either without merit or need not be reached in light of our determination. Florio, J.P., Crane, Ritter and Lifson, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

22 A.D.3d 747, 802 N.Y.S.2d 624, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/winchester-global-trust-co-v-donovan-nyappdiv-2005.