Winchell v. Latham

7 Cow. 367
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Winchell v. Latham. Read the opinion of the Court — 6 Cow. 682
New York Supreme Court·Decided August 15, 1827·Published

Opinion

On a motion for a re-taxation of costs: The conit de°*ded ^at lowing items were allowable to the plaintiff, on a verdict recovered against the defendant:

Counsel for perusing and amending declaration; and-three copies of the declaration.

But they disallowed the following:

Braft and engrossing H. P. record, with pleadings, &c., because this had been paid for by the defendant at a previous circuit, on putting off the trial; and a testatum execution, on the ground that the defendant, both when the ' ° 1 action was commenced, and when the costs were taxed, ™ ^ county of Oneida, where the venue was laid.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Winchell v. Latham, 7 Cow. 367 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1827).

7 Cow. 367 (Winchell v. Latham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.