Winchell v. Dinsmore

11 Ind. 351
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 15, 1858
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 11 Ind. 351 (Winchell v. Dinsmore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Winchell v. Dinsmore, 11 Ind. 351 (Ind. 1858).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This was an action by the appellees, who were the plaintiffs, against Winchell and Nichols, to recover 100 dollars advanced to them by the plaintiffs upon a contract for the delivery of 2,000 dollars’ worth of American porcelain ware, which contract, it is alleged, the defendants wholly failed to perform. The answer to the complaint is a general denial. The Court tried the cause, and found for the plaintiffs, and, having refused a new trial, rendered judgment.

The refusal to grant a new trial, is the only ruling of the Common Pleas to which the defendants appear to have excepted; and the only question raised by the assignment of error, relates to the sufficiency of the evidence. We have examined it carefully, and are of opinion that its weight sustains the judgment.

The judgment is affirmed, with 10 per cent, damages and costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Daily
85 N.W. 629 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1901)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
11 Ind. 351, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/winchell-v-dinsmore-ind-1858.