Winchel v. Howard

76 Ind. 379
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided May 15, 1881·No. No. 8163·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Newcomb, C.

The appellants filed their complaint to vacate and set aside an order for the taxation of costs,, made at a preceding term of the [380]*380court, in a cause wherein the appellants were defendants and the appellee Howard was plaintiff. A denial was filed to the complaint, and' on the issue"thqs made there was a finding and judgment for the appellee, over a motion by appellants for a new trial.

There is no bill of exceptions in the record, and consequently no question is presented by the appeal.

The judgment should be affirmed.

Pee Cueiam. — It is therefore ordered, upon the foregoing opinion, that the judgment below be, and it is hereby, in all things affirmed, at the costs of the appellants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Winchel v. Howard, 76 Ind. 379 (Ind. 1881).

76 Ind. 379 (Winchel v. Howard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Aufderheide v. Heward
117 N.E. 212 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1917)