Winchel v. Howard
This text of 76 Ind. 379 (Winchel v. Howard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appellants filed their complaint to vacate and set aside an order for the taxation of costs,, made at a preceding term of the [380]*380court, in a cause wherein the appellants were defendants and the appellee Howard was plaintiff. A denial was filed to the complaint, and' on the issue"thqs made there was a finding and judgment for the appellee, over a motion by appellants for a new trial.
There is no bill of exceptions in the record, and consequently no question is presented by the appeal.
The judgment should be affirmed.
Pee Cueiam. — It is therefore ordered, upon the foregoing opinion, that the judgment below be, and it is hereby, in all things affirmed, at the costs of the appellants.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
76 Ind. 379, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/winchel-v-howard-ind-1881.