Winch v. Third Avenue Railroad
This text of 14 Misc. 642 (Winch v. Third Avenue Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Common Pleas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
That the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence is conclusively established by the adjudication of-the Court of Appeals in Scott v. Penn. R. R. Co., 130 N. Y. 679.
The court did not overlook- the rule that if defendant could, [643]*643by the exercise of ordinary care, have prevented the accident, the plaintiff was, notwithstanding his own negligence, entitled to recover, but wo' held that the case is not within the rule, because there was' no proof that the defendant could, by the exercise of ordinary care, have avoided the collision complained of.
Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.
Present: Daly, Oh. J., Bischoff and Pbyob, JJY
Miotion denied, with ten dollars costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
14 Misc. 642, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/winch-v-third-avenue-railroad-nyctcompl-1895.