Winch v. Third Avenue Railroad

14 Misc. 642
CourtNew York Court of Common Pleas
DecidedJuly 1, 1895
StatusPublished

This text of 14 Misc. 642 (Winch v. Third Avenue Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Common Pleas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Winch v. Third Avenue Railroad, 14 Misc. 642 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1895).

Opinion

Per O'wriam.

That the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence is conclusively established by the adjudication of-the Court of Appeals in Scott v. Penn. R. R. Co., 130 N. Y. 679.

The court did not overlook- the rule that if defendant could, [643]*643by the exercise of ordinary care, have prevented the accident, the plaintiff was, notwithstanding his own negligence, entitled to recover, but wo' held that the case is not within the rule, because there was' no proof that the defendant could, by the exercise of ordinary care, have avoided the collision complained of.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.

Present: Daly, Oh. J., Bischoff and Pbyob, JJY

Miotion denied, with ten dollars costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Scott v. . Pennsylvania Railroad Company
29 N.E. 289 (New York Court of Appeals, 1891)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
14 Misc. 642, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/winch-v-third-avenue-railroad-nyctcompl-1895.