Wincek v. Smith (In Re Wincek)

M.D. Florida

Wincek v. Smith (In Re Wincek)

208 B.R. 238, 78 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 7448, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17218, 1996 WL 885849

CourtDistrict Court, M.D. Florida

DecidedOctober 30, 1996

Docket96-944-Civ-T-23C

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 208 B.R. 238 (Wincek v. Smith (In Re Wincek)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, M.D. Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wincek v. Smith (In Re Wincek), 208 B.R. 238, 78 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 7448, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17218, 1996 WL 885849 (M.D. Fla. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

*239 ORDER

MERRYDAY, District Judge.

The Court has reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal, including Judge Paul M. Glenn’s excellent order of dismissal. Upon consideration, the decision of the bankruptcy court is AFFIRMED. 1 I agree with Judge Glenn that this ease is properly limited to its facts. For example, the doctrine of unconstitutional conditions, to the extent it retains vitality, might invite different considerations and even a different result under different circumstances.

1

. The district court dispensed with oral argument pursuant to section (3) of paragraph two of rule 8012.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*239 ORDER

MERRYDAY, District Judge.

The Court has reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal, including Judge Paul M. Glenn’s excellent order of dismissal. Upon consideration, the decision of the bankruptcy court is AFFIRMED. 1 I agree with Judge Glenn that this ease is properly limited to its facts. For example, the doctrine of unconstitutional conditions, to the extent it retains vitality, might invite different considerations and even a different result under different circumstances.

1

. The district court dispensed with oral argument pursuant to section (3) of paragraph two of rule 8012.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

208 B.R. 238, 78 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 7448, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17218, 1996 WL 885849, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wincek-v-smith-in-re-wincek-flmd-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack