Winbush v. City of Mount Vernon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Winbush v. City of Mount Vernon

283 A.D. 950, 130 N.Y.S.2d 90, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5900

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Winbush v. City of Mount Vernon. Read the opinion of the Court — 282 A.D. 749 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 3, 1954·Published

Opinion

Upon remission of this appeal from the Court of Appeals (306 N. Y. 327), in pursuance of section 606 of the Civil Practice Act, for determination of the question of fact as to discretion, order of Special Term denying motion to dismiss the first and third causes of action and granting the cross motion to amend the notice of claim, insofar as not affirmed heretofore, affirmed, without costs. In the situation here presented, we find that discretion Was properly exercised to grant the motion to amend the notice of claim. Adel, Acting P. J., Wenzel, MacCrate, Schmidt and Beldock, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Upon remission of this appeal from the Court of Appeals (306 N. Y. 327), in pursuance of section 606 of the Civil Practice Act, for determination of the question of fact as to discretion, order of Special Term denying motion to dismiss the first and third causes of action and granting the cross motion to amend the notice of claim, insofar as not affirmed heretofore, affirmed, without costs. In the situation here presented, we find that discretion Was properly exercised to grant the motion to amend the notice of claim. Adel, Acting P. J., Wenzel, MacCrate, Schmidt and Beldock, JJ., concur.

Winbush v. City of Mount Vernon, 283 A.D. 950, 130 N.Y.S.2d 90, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5900 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1954).

Pincite

283 A.D. 950 (Winbush v. City of Mount Vernon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related