Winberry v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Winberry v. State

775 S.W.2d 896, 300 Ark. 32

Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided September 18, 1989·No. RC 89-38·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Petitioner, Lance Winberry, by his attorney, Ronald L. Griggs, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney takes responsibility for the record being tendered after the ninety-day time limit for filing a record in this court. See Ark. R. App. P. 5(a).

We find that such error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See Terry v. State, 272 Ark. 243 (1981); In re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct. In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Petitioner, Lance Winberry, by his attorney, Ronald L. Griggs, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney takes responsibility for the record being tendered after the ninety-day time limit for filing a record in this court. See Ark. R. App. P. 5(a).

We find that such error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See Terry v. State, 272 Ark. 243 (1981); In re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct. In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964.

Winberry v. State, 775 S.W.2d 896, 300 Ark. 32 (Ark. 1989).

Pincite

775 S.W.2d 896 (Winberry v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related