Home/Supreme Court of Arkansas/Winberry v. State

Winberry v. State

775 S.W.2d 896, 300 Ark. 32
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedSeptember 18, 1989
DocketRC 89-38
StatusPublished

This text of 775 S.W.2d 896 (Winberry v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Winberry v. State, 775 S.W.2d 896, 300 Ark. 32 (Ark. 1989).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Petitioner, Lance Winberry, by his attorney, Ronald L. Griggs, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney takes responsibility for the record being tendered after the ninety-day time limit for filing a record in this court. See Ark. R. App. P. 5(a).

We find that such error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See Terry v. State, 272 Ark. 243 (1981); In re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct. In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Terry v. State
613 S.W.2d 90 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
775 S.W.2d 896, 300 Ark. 32, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/winberry-v-state-ark-1989.