Winarske v. State
This text of 2015 ND 21 (Winarske v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Filed 2/12/15 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2015 ND 21
Adam Winarske, Petitioner and Appellant
v.
State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee
Nos. 20140112-20140118
Appeal from the District Court of Stark County, Southwest Judicial District, the Honorable William A. Herauf, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Lynn Slaathaug Moen, P.O. Box 547, Mayville, ND 58257, for petitioner and appellant; submitted on brief.
James Allen Hope, Assistant State’s Attorney, P.O. Box 130, Dickinson, ND 58602-0130, for respondent and appellee; submitted on brief.
Winarske v. State
[¶1] Adam Winarske appealed a district court judgment denying his application for post-conviction relief. Winarske argued he is entitled to post-conviction relief because he received ineffective assistance of counsel, his guilty pleas were not knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily given, and he was denied effective assistance of counsel at all stages of the proceedings. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2), concluding the district court did not err in dismissing Winarske’s application for post-conviction relief, after an evidentiary hearing.
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Dale V. Sandstrom
Daniel J. Crothers
Lisa Fair McEvers
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2015 ND 21, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/winarske-v-state-nd-2015.