Winans v. Manz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Winans v. Manz

54 A.D.2d 597, 387 N.Y.S.2d 316, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13971

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 16, 1976

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 54 A.D.2d 597 (Winans v. Manz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Winans v. Manz, 54 A.D.2d 597, 387 N.Y.S.2d 316, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13971 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal unanimously dismissed, without costs. Memorandum: Appellant appeals from a decision of Special Term dismissing his petition to vacate and annul the determination of respondent Board of Elections accepting designating petition containing the names of respondent Victor E. Manz for Erie County Family Court Judge and respondent Michael A. Amico for Erie County Sheriff, and for other relief. No order or judgment has been entered on Special Term’s decision and no written notice of appeal has been filed or served. No appeal lies from a decision on which an order or judgment has not been entered (People v Murphy, 36 AD2d 684; Bank of Utica v Castle Ford, 36 AD2d 6, 10; Matter of Lust, 35 AD2d 997); and we have no jurisdiction to review an order or judgment where a notice of appeal therefrom has not been filed (CPLR 5515, subd 1; 7 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, NY Civ Prac, par 5515.06; Gouvakis v 490 Tenth Ave. Corp., 6 AD2d 1035). We have, however, examined the merits of the petition and, had an order or judgment been entered and a proper appeal taken, we would affirm. (Appeal from decision of Erie Supreme Court—Election Law.) Present—Marsh, P. J., Simons, Mahoney, Dillon and Witmer, JJ. (Decided Aug. 26, 1976.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal unanimously dismissed, without costs. Memorandum: Appellant appeals from a decision of Special Term dismissing his petition to vacate and annul the determination of respondent Board of Elections accepting designating petition containing the names of respondent Victor E. Manz for Erie County Family Court Judge and respondent Michael A. Amico for Erie County Sheriff, and for other relief. No order or judgment has been entered on Special Term’s decision and no written notice of appeal has been filed or served. No appeal lies from a decision on which an order or judgment has not been entered (People v Murphy, 36 AD2d 684; Bank of Utica v Castle Ford, 36 AD2d 6, 10; Matter of Lust, 35 AD2d 997); and we have no jurisdiction to review an order or judgment where a notice of appeal therefrom has not been filed (CPLR 5515, subd 1; 7 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, NY Civ Prac, par 5515.06; Gouvakis v 490 Tenth Ave. Corp., 6 AD2d 1035). We have, however, examined the merits of the petition and, had an order or judgment been entered and a proper appeal taken, we would affirm. (Appeal from decision of Erie Supreme Court—Election Law.) Present—Marsh, P. J., Simons, Mahoney, Dillon and Witmer, JJ. (Decided Aug. 26, 1976.)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

54 A.D.2d 597, 387 N.Y.S.2d 316, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13971, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/winans-v-manz-nyappdiv-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack