Winans v. Denmead

30 F. Cas. 261, 9 Leg. Int. 74

This text of 30 F. Cas. 261 (Winans v. Denmead) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Winans v. Denmead, 30 F. Cas. 261, 9 Leg. Int. 74 (circtdmd 1852).

Opinion

THE COURT

[GLENN, District Judge]

decided, after a full argument, that the plaintiff had by his patent restricted himself to the particular form of car body there described, and was consequently not entitled to recover.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
30 F. Cas. 261, 9 Leg. Int. 74, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/winans-v-denmead-circtdmd-1852.