Winans v. Denman

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Winans v. Denman

2 N.J.L. 124

DecidedNovember 15, 1806

StatusPublished

This text of 2 N.J.L. 124 (Winans v. Denman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Winans v. Denman, 2 N.J.L. 124 (N.J. 1806).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court.

— This judgment cannot, by any rule of law, be sustained. The state of demand does not set out a legal cause of action, even if it was alleged as an injury done to both the plaintiffs; further, a joint cause of action is not even alleged, but an injury to one of the defendants in this court, only, is stated. Two men cannot join in an action for an injury done to one of them only.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court.

— This judgment cannot, by any rule of law, be sustained. The state of demand does not set out a legal cause of action, even if it was alleged as an injury done to both the plaintiffs; further, a joint cause of action is not even alleged, but an injury to one of the defendants in this court, only, is stated. Two men cannot join in an action for an injury done to one of them only.

Judgment reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 N.J.L. 124, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/winans-v-denman-nj-1806.