Winans v. Denman

2 N.J.L. 124
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided November 15, 1806·Published

Opinion

By the Court.

— This judgment cannot, by any rule of law, be sustained. The state of demand does not set out a legal cause of action, even if it was alleged as an injury done to both the plaintiffs; further, a joint cause of action is not even alleged, but an injury to one of the defendants in this court, only, is stated. Two men cannot join in an action for an injury done to one of them only.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Winans v. Denman, 2 N.J.L. 124 (N.J. 1806).

2 N.J.L. 124 (Winans v. Denman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.