Win Feng LLC v. Lawrence
This text of Win Feng LLC v. Lawrence (Win Feng LLC v. Lawrence) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
against
Jeffrey Adam Lawrence, Respondent-Tenant-Appellant, and "John Doe" and/or "Jane Doe," Respondents-Undertenants.
Tenant appeals from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County (Anne Katz, J.), entered December 15, 2016, which, in a nonpayment summary proceeding, granted landlord's motion for attorneys' fees and directed a hearing to determine the reasonable value of such fees.
Per Curiam.
Order (Anne Katz, J.), entered December 15, 2016, affirmed, with $10 costs.
Civil Court properly concluded that landlord was the prevailing party entitled to attorneys' fees in this nonpayment proceeding, which was resolved via a so-ordered stipulation of settlement, whereby tenant withdrew his answer, consented to the entry of judgment for the rent arrears sought by landlord without setoff or abatement, and whose terms expressly reserved landlord's right to seek attorneys' fees (see Excelsior 57th Corp. v Winters, 227 AD2d 146 [1996]; Peachy v Rosenzweig, 215 AD2d 301 [1995]). The record discloses no manifest unfairness or bad faith by landlord that would justify a denial of its right to seek attorneys' fees pursuant to the legal fees provision in the parties' lease (see Matter of 251 CPW Hous. LLC v Pastreich, 124 AD3d 401, 404 [2015]).
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.
I concur I concur I concur
Decision Date: September 19, 2018
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Win Feng LLC v. Lawrence, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/win-feng-llc-v-lawrence-nyappterm-2018.