Wims v. State

215 S.W. 204, 85 Tex. Crim. 657, 1919 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 329
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided October 15, 1919·No. No. 5443.·Published

Opinion

MORROW, Judge.

The appellant was convicted of transporting intoxicating liquors into a part of the State embraced within the Act of the Thirty-fourth Legislature, known as the Zone Law. See Ex parte Hollingworth, 83 Texas Crim. Rep., 400, 203 S. W. Rep., 1102.

The record before us is accompanied by no statement of facts, and contains no bills of exception. We find no fundamental vice in the judgment or other proceedings. We must, in the absence of statement of facts, presume the evidence sufficient, and in the absence of bills of exceptions, that there were no irregularities in the trial. The judgment is, therefore, affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wims v. State, 215 S.W. 204, 85 Tex. Crim. 657, 1919 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 329 (Tex. 1919).

215 S.W. 204 (Wims v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ex Parte Hollingsworth
203 S.W. 1102 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1918)