Wims v. State
This text of 215 S.W. 304 (Wims v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appellant was convicted of transporting intoxicating liquors into a part of the state embraced within the act of the Thirty-Fourth Legislature (chapter 12), known as the Zone Law. See Ex parte Hollingsworth v. State, 203 S. W. 1102.
The record before us is accompanied by no statement of facts, and contains no bills of exception. We find no fundamental vice in the judgment or other proceedings. We must, in the absence of statement of facts, presume the evidence sufficient, and, in the absence of bills of exceptions, that there were no irregularities in the'trial.
The judgment is therefore affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
215 S.W. 304, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wims-v-state-texcrimapp-1919.