Wims v. State
159 So. 3d 1001, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 4131, 2015 WL 1281649
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 23, 2015·No. No. 1D15-0889·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
The petitioner alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is dismissed as successive. The petitioner is warned that any future filings deemed by this court to be successive, frivolous, abusive, or malicious may result in sanctions, including but not limited to a prohibition on any further pro se appearances before this court. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.410.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wims v. State, 159 So. 3d 1001, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 4131, 2015 WL 1281649 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).
159 So. 3d 1001 (Wims v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Roderick Kenneth Wims v. State of Florida
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2021