Wims v. State
159 So. 3d 1001, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 4131, 2015 WL 1281649
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 23, 2015
DocketNo. 1D15-0889
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 159 So. 3d 1001 (Wims v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Wims v. State, 159 So. 3d 1001, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 4131, 2015 WL 1281649 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).
Opinion
The petitioner alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is dismissed as successive. The petitioner is warned that any future filings deemed by this court to be successive, frivolous, abusive, or malicious may result in sanctions, including but not limited to a prohibition on any further pro se appearances before this court. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.410.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Roderick Kenneth Wims v. State of Florida
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2021
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
159 So. 3d 1001, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 4131, 2015 WL 1281649, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wims-v-state-fladistctapp-2015.