Wimms v. State
This text of 70 S.E. 254 (Wimms v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. There was no merit in the criticism on the charge of the court because, in beginning his instructions, he stated that he recognized that some of the jury were weary and1 their minds flagging by reason of their arduous duties during the current week.
2. The newly discovered evidence merely tended to impeach the witnesses' for the State, and furnished no ground for a new trial.
3. The verdict was supported by the evidence, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.
Judgment a/jirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
70 S.E. 254, 135 Ga. 659, 1911 Ga. LEXIS 36, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wimms-v-state-ga-1911.