Wimms v. State
70 S.E. 254, 135 Ga. 659, 1911 Ga. LEXIS 36
Opinion
1. There was no merit in the criticism on the charge of the court because, in beginning his instructions, he stated that he recognized that some of the jury were weary and1 their minds flagging by reason of their arduous duties during the current week.
2. The newly discovered evidence merely tended to impeach the witnesses' for the State, and furnished no ground for a new trial.
3. The verdict was supported by the evidence, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.
Judgment a/jirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wimms v. State, 70 S.E. 254, 135 Ga. 659, 1911 Ga. LEXIS 36 (Ga. 1911).
70 S.E. 254 (Wimms v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Social Circle Cotton Mill Co. v. Ransom
99 S.E. 238 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1919)
Bragg v. State
83 S.E. 274 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1914)
Miller v. State
78 S.E. 181 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1913)