WIMMER, CHARLES v. TOMPKINS, MARK
Opinion
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
109 CA 11-01524 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.
CHARLES WIMMER, AS DIRECTOR AND OFFICER OF UNITED CABLE TECHS, INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
V ORDER
MARK TOMPKINS, DIRECTECHNOLOGIES, LLC, ROBERT PINE AND JAMES WILDE, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
J. SCOTT PORTER, SENECA FALLS, FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.
LAW OFFICE OF CARL J. DEPALMA, AUBURN (CARL J. DEPALMA OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS DIRECTECHNOLOGIES, LLC, ROBERT PINE AND JAMES WILDE.
Appeal from a judgment (denominated order) of the Supreme Court, Seneca County (Dennis F. Bender, A.J.), entered December 10, 2010. The judgment dismissed plaintiff’s causes of action after a nonjury trial.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court.
Entered: February 10, 2012 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
WIMMER, CHARLES v. TOMPKINS, MARK (WIMMER, CHARLES v. TOMPKINS, MARK) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.