WIMMER, CHARLES v. TOMPKINS, MARK

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 10, 2012·No. CA 11-01524·Published

Opinion

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

109 CA 11-01524 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.

CHARLES WIMMER, AS DIRECTOR AND OFFICER OF UNITED CABLE TECHS, INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

V ORDER

MARK TOMPKINS, DIRECTECHNOLOGIES, LLC, ROBERT PINE AND JAMES WILDE, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

J. SCOTT PORTER, SENECA FALLS, FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.

LAW OFFICE OF CARL J. DEPALMA, AUBURN (CARL J. DEPALMA OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS DIRECTECHNOLOGIES, LLC, ROBERT PINE AND JAMES WILDE.

Appeal from a judgment (denominated order) of the Supreme Court, Seneca County (Dennis F. Bender, A.J.), entered December 10, 2010. The judgment dismissed plaintiff’s causes of action after a nonjury trial.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court.

Entered: February 10, 2012 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WIMMER, CHARLES v. TOMPKINS, MARK, (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

WIMMER, CHARLES v. TOMPKINS, MARK (WIMMER, CHARLES v. TOMPKINS, MARK) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.