Wimer v. Pennsylvania Employees Benefit Trust Fund
This text of 908 A.2d 268 (Wimer v. Pennsylvania Employees Benefit Trust Fund) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 14th day of September 2006, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is granted limited to the following issues:
Did the Superior Court err as a matter of law when it concluded that Appellee Gary E. Wimer (“Wimer”) was not required to exhaust his contractual remedies under the PEBTF’s governing plan documents?
Did the Superior Court err as a matter of law when it concluded that the PEBTF’s right to subrogation is determined as of the date when it reimbursed [269]*269Wimer’s medical expenses and therefore concluded that the PEBTF should be denied the right of subrogation for any medical payments made on Wimer’s behalf after January 1,1998?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
908 A.2d 268, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wimer-v-pennsylvania-employees-benefit-trust-fund-pa-2006.