Wimelbacher & Rice v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Wimelbacher & Rice v. United States

20 Cust. Ct. 256, 1948 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 90

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedJanuary 28, 1948

DocketNo. 52141; protests 867317-G, etc. (New York)

StatusPublished

This text of 20 Cust. Ct. 256 (Wimelbacher & Rice v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wimelbacher & Rice v. United States, 20 Cust. Ct. 256, 1948 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 90 (cusc 1948).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following United States v. Julius Kayser & Co. (33 C. C. P. A. 179, C. A. D. 333) the cotton gloves were held dutiable at 50 percent under paragraph 915 as “made of fabric knit on other than a warp-knitting machine,” and the knit cotton fabric was held dutiable at 35 percent uhder paragraph 914 as “made on other than a warp-knitting machine,” plus 10 cents per pound additional duty under paragraph 924 in both instances.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following United States v. Julius Kayser & Co. (33 C. C. P. A. 179, C. A. D. 333) the cotton gloves were held dutiable at 50 percent under paragraph 915 as “made of fabric knit on other than a warp-knitting machine,” and the knit cotton fabric was held dutiable at 35 percent uhder paragraph 914 as “made on other than a warp-knitting machine,” plus 10 cents per pound additional duty under paragraph 924 in both instances.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

20 Cust. Ct. 256, 1948 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 90, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wimelbacher-rice-v-united-states-cusc-1948.