Wimby v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Wimby v. State

265 S.E.2d 80, 153 Ga. App. 220, 1980 Ga. App. LEXIS 1756

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided January 24, 1980·No. 59237·Published

Opinion

Quillian, Presiding Judge.

The sole issue raised by defendant’s appeal from his conviction for possession of tools for the commission of crime and theft by taking is whether the evidence was sufficient to sustain the verdict. Held:

Based on the evidence adduced at the trial a rational fact finder could have found proof of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

Judgment affirmed.

Shulman and Carley, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Quillian, Presiding Judge.

The sole issue raised by defendant’s appeal from his conviction for possession of tools for the commission of crime and theft by taking is whether the evidence was sufficient to sustain the verdict. Held:

Based on the evidence adduced at the trial a rational fact finder could have found proof of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

Judgment affirmed.

Shulman and Carley, JJ., concur.

Wimby v. State, 265 S.E.2d 80, 153 Ga. App. 220, 1980 Ga. App. LEXIS 1756 (Ga. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

265 S.E.2d 80 (Wimby v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.