Wimbley v. Alabama

136 S. Ct. 2387, 195 L. Ed. 2d 760, 84 U.S.L.W. 3653, 2016 U.S. LEXIS 3532
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided May 31, 2016·No. No. 15–7939.·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

On petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama for further consideration in light of Hurst v. Florida, 577 U.S. ----, 136 S.Ct. 616, 193 L.Ed.2d 504 (2016).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wimbley v. Alabama, 136 S. Ct. 2387, 195 L. Ed. 2d 760, 84 U.S.L.W. 3653, 2016 U.S. LEXIS 3532 (U.S. 2016).

136 S. Ct. 2387 (Wimbley v. Alabama) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Timothy Lee Hurst v. State of Florida
202 So. 3d 40 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2016)
Rauf v. State
145 A.3d 430 (Supreme Court of Delaware, 2016)