Wimbish v. Douglass

Supreme Court of Florida

Wimbish v. Douglass

117 So. 323, 95 Fla. 1020

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Wimbish v. Douglass. Read the opinion of the Court — 92 Fla. 224 →

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided June 11, 1928·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and *1021 inspected and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and *1021 inspected and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.

Wimbish v. Douglass, 117 So. 323, 95 Fla. 1020 (Fla. 1928).

Pincite

117 So. 323 (Wimbish v. Douglass) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.