Wimberly v. Stern

S.D. New York

Wimberly v. Stern

DecidedJuly 21, 2023

Docket1:22-cv-07581

StatusUnknown

This text of Wimberly v. Stern (Wimberly v. Stern) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wimberly v. Stern, (S.D.N.Y. 2023).

Pincite

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

JASON WIMBERLY 22-cv-7581 (VSB) PLAINTIFF TRIAL BY JURY DEMANDED V.

MELANIE STERN, JAY LAWRENCE HACK, GALLET, DREYER & BERKEY, LLP DEFENDANTS

MOTION FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE Now comes Plaintiff Jason Wimberly and pursuant to Federal Rules of Evidence Rule 201 and moves this Court to take judicial notice of Defendant Spring Bank’s Website in its entirety or in the alternative, the following pages on its website: https://www.spring.bank/about-us/ https://www.spring. bank/3-reasons-to-bank-with-a-cdfi-like-us/ https://www.spring. bank/investing-in-us-to-invest-in-you/ https://www.spring.bank/micromobility-for-new-yorkers-via-a-financial-inclusion-grant/ https://www.spring. bank/cdfis-on-the-front-lines-of-emergency-lending/ https://www.spring. bank/ethical-banking/ https://www.americanbanker.com/conference/digital-lending-investing-2017/speakers/melanie-st erm APPLICATION GRANTED https://www.cdfifund. gov/about SO ORDERED A Jenn, BLAH VERNON S. BRODERICK US.D J. 7/21/23 I take judicial notice of these website pages pursuant to Fed. R. Evid. 201 because the website pag are publicly available and their existence is not subject to reasonable dispute. See Nat'l Acad. of Television Arts & Scis., Inc. v. Multimedia Sys. Design, Inc., 551 F. Supp. 3d 408, 418 □□□□□□□□□ 2021). I make no findings as to the truth of the matters asserted on any of the website pages. The

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

JASON WIMBERLY 22-cv-7581 (VSB) PLAINTIFF TRIAL BY JURY DEMANDED V.

MELANIE STERN, JAY LAWRENCE HACK, GALLET, DREYER & BERKEY, LLP DEFENDANTS

MOTION FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE Now comes Plaintiff Jason Wimberly and pursuant to Federal Rules of Evidence Rule 201 and moves this Court to take judicial notice of Defendant Spring Bank’s Website in its entirety or in the alternative, the following pages on its website: https://www.spring.bank/about-us/ https://www.spring. bank/3-reasons-to-bank-with-a-cdfi-like-us/ https://www.spring. bank/investing-in-us-to-invest-in-you/ https://www.spring.bank/micromobility-for-new-yorkers-via-a-financial-inclusion-grant/ https://www.spring. bank/cdfis-on-the-front-lines-of-emergency-lending/ https://www.spring. bank/ethical-banking/ https://www.americanbanker.com/conference/digital-lending-investing-2017/speakers/melanie-st erm APPLICATION GRANTED https://www.cdfifund. gov/about SO ORDERED A Jenn, BLAH VERNON S. BRODERICK US.D J. 7/21/23 I take judicial notice of these website pages pursuant to Fed. R. Evid. 201 because the website pag are publicly available and their existence is not subject to reasonable dispute. See Nat'l Acad. of Television Arts & Scis., Inc. v. Multimedia Sys. Design, Inc., 551 F. Supp. 3d 408, 418 □□□□□□□□□ 2021). I make no findings as to the truth of the matters asserted on any of the website pages. The

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Wimberly v. Stern, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wimberly-v-stern-nysd-2023.