Wimberly v. Buford
This text of 1983 OK 25 (Wimberly v. Buford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Jurisdiction assumed; let certiorari issue to the Court of Appeals, Temporary Division 113.
The opinion of the Court of Appeals Temporary Division 113 is hereby vacated, for a Court of Appeals may not overrule an opinion of the Supreme Court of Oklahoma. Rule 3.13 A(4), 12 O.S.1981, Chap. 15, App. 3.
This Court is further of the opinion that Sudheimer v. Cheatam, 443 P.2d 951 (Okl.1968) is distinguishable in fact from and therefore not in conflict with Leach v. West, 504 P.2d 1233, 1237 (Okl.1972), and should not be overruled.
Leach v. West, supra, is dispositive.
*1051 CERTIORARI GRANTED; COURT OF APPEALS’ OPINION VACATED; TRIAL COURT’S JUDGMENT AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1983 OK 25, 660 P.2d 1050, 1983 Okla. LEXIS 160, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wimberly-v-buford-okla-1983.