Wimberley v. Rogers

Fourth Circuit

Wimberley v. Rogers

66 F. App'x 512

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 18, 2003·No. No. 02-2141·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

John Russell Wimberley, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Wimberley v. Rogers, No. CA-02-890-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Sept. 11, 2002). Wimberley’s motions to deny the Defendants’ brief and for injunctive relief are denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

John Russell Wimberley, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Wimberley v. Rogers, No. CA-02-890-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Sept. 11, 2002). Wimberley’s motions to deny the Defendants’ brief and for injunctive relief are denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Wimberley v. Rogers, 66 F. App'x 512 (4th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

66 F. App'x 512 (Wimberley v. Rogers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.