Wimberley v. North Carolina

Fourth Circuit

Wimberley v. North Carolina

15 F. App'x 113

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 31, 2001·No. No. 01-1259·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

John Russell Wimberley, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915(e)(2) (West Supp.2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Wimberley v. North Carolina, No. CA-00-946-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Jan. 11, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

John Russell Wimberley, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915(e)(2) (West Supp.2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Wimberley v. North Carolina, No. CA-00-946-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Jan. 11, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Wimberley v. North Carolina, 15 F. App'x 113 (4th Cir. 2001).

Pincite

15 F. App'x 113 (Wimberley v. North Carolina) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related