Wilson's Ex'x v. Rine

General Court of Virginia

Wilson's Ex'x v. Rine

1 H. & J. 138

General Court of Virginia·Decided May 15, 1801·Published

Opinion

The General Court were of opinion, that the assent of the executrix was necessary to vest the legacy in the legatee, Priscilla, the wife of the appel-lee, and that proof of such assent ought to have been adduced to the juryj and that the court below erred in not giving the direction thereupon prayed. The judgment of the county court was therefore reversed, and the record ordered to be remitted with a writ of procedendo.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The General Court were of opinion, that the assent of the executrix was necessary to vest the legacy in the legatee, Priscilla, the wife of the appel-lee, and that proof of such assent ought to have been adduced to the juryj and that the court below erred in not giving the direction thereupon prayed. The judgment of the county court was therefore reversed, and the record ordered to be remitted with a writ of procedendo.

Wilson's Ex'x v. Rine, 1 H. & J. 138 (Va. Super. Ct. 1801).

Pincite

1 H. & J. 138 (Wilson's Ex'x v. Rine) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.