Wilson's Ex'x v. Rine

General Court of Virginia

Wilson's Ex'x v. Rine

1 H. & J. 138

DecidedMay 15, 1801

StatusPublished

This text of 1 H. & J. 138 (Wilson's Ex'x v. Rine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering General Court of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wilson's Ex'x v. Rine, 1 H. & J. 138 (Va. Super. Ct. 1801).

Pincite

Opinion

The General Court were of opinion, that the assent of the executrix was necessary to vest the legacy in the legatee, Priscilla, the wife of the appel-lee, and that proof of such assent ought to have been adduced to the juryj and that the court below erred in not giving the direction thereupon prayed. The judgment of the county court was therefore reversed, and the record ordered to be remitted with a writ of procedendo.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The General Court were of opinion, that the assent of the executrix was necessary to vest the legacy in the legatee, Priscilla, the wife of the appel-lee, and that proof of such assent ought to have been adduced to the juryj and that the court below erred in not giving the direction thereupon prayed. The judgment of the county court was therefore reversed, and the record ordered to be remitted with a writ of procedendo.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 H. & J. 138, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilsons-exx-v-rine-vagensess-1801.