Wilson v. Woodside

57 Me. 489
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine·Decided July 1, 1870·Published

Opinion

Appleton, C. J.

It is immaterial how the complainant is “ put upon the discovery of the truth during the time of her travail,” whether by investigation from without, or by impulse from within. The accusation is what the statute regards as material. When that is made, inquiry becomes unnecessary. The object of the statute is accomplished. Totman v. Forsaith, 55 Maine, 360. McManagil v. Ross, 20 Pick. 99. Bailey v. Chesley, 10 Cush. 285.

Exceptions sustained.

Kent, Walton, Barrows, Daneorth, and Tapley, J J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wilson v. Woodside, 57 Me. 489 (Me. 1870).

57 Me. 489 (Wilson v. Woodside) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.