Wilson v. Wolfer

Indiana Supreme Court

Wilson v. Wolfer

8 Ind. 398

CourtIndiana Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 8, 1857

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 8 Ind. 398 (Wilson v. Wolfer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wilson v. Wolfer, 8 Ind. 398 (Ind. 1857).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Action for money had and received. Answer in denial. Jury trial. Instructions given and refused. Verdict for the plaintiff. Motion for a new trial refused. “ To all which the defendant excepts, and prays that this his bill of exceptions may be signed,” &c. We have often decided that exceptions cannot be reserved in this way. Exceptions cannot be taken in gross to all the rulings in a cause. Each decision, when made, must be excepted to. Stump v. Fraley, 7 Ind. R. 679. — Corey v. Rhineheart, 2 id. 290.

The judgment is affirmed, with 5 per cent, damages and costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Action for money had and received. Answer in denial. Jury trial. Instructions given and refused. Verdict for the plaintiff. Motion for a new trial refused. “ To all which the defendant excepts, and prays that this his bill of exceptions may be signed,” &c. We have often decided that exceptions cannot be reserved in this way. Exceptions cannot be taken in gross to all the rulings in a cause. Each decision, when made, must be excepted to. Stump v. Fraley, 7 Ind. R. 679. — Corey v. Rhineheart, 2 id. 290.

The judgment is affirmed, with 5 per cent, damages and costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

8 Ind. 398, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-v-wolfer-ind-1857.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack