Wilson v. Wilson

44 A.D.2d 667, 355 N.Y.S.2d 385, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5218
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 18, 1974
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 44 A.D.2d 667 (Wilson v. Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wilson v. Wilson, 44 A.D.2d 667, 355 N.Y.S.2d 385, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5218 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1974).

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on September 17, 1973, granting defendant’s motion to set aside a stipulation of settlement and to restore the action for trial, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, without costs and without disbursements, the motion denied, the stipulation reinstated and the action remanded for further proceedings. In this matrimonial action, a stipulation was entered into in open court on June 8, 1973 whereby the defendant withdrew his answer and counterclaim. Both parties were represented by counsel and the stipulation was entered into in their presence. Relief from a stipulation of settlement will be granted in the court’s discretion upon showing of good cause, such as collusion, mistake, accident or similar ground (see D & E Development Corp. v. Parkchester Clothes Corp., 27 A D 2d 658; 2A Weinstein-Korn-Miller, N. Y. Civ. Prac., par. 2104.05). Scrutiny of the record impels the conclusion that no good cause existed for relieving the defendant of the stipulation. In the absence of a showing of good cause and it no wise appearing that the stipulation was made by the defendant’s attorney without authorization, or is unduly harsh, the stipulation must be adhered to. Concur — Markewich, J. P., Murphy, Lupiano and Steuer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rodgers v. C & R Enterprises, Inc.
187 A.D.2d 708 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
In re Daniel C.
99 A.D.2d 35 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
Anderson v. Anderson
90 A.D.2d 763 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
Solack Estates, Inc. v. Goodman
102 Misc. 2d 504 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1979)
Stiber v. Stiber
65 A.D.2d 758 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)
Breitman Iron Works, Inc. v. T. L. Rubsamen & Co.
55 A.D.2d 632 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
Cheatham v. Cheatham
93 Misc. 2d 576 (New York Supreme Court, 1976)
Dastin v. Dastin
54 A.D.2d 749 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
Rado v. Rado
51 A.D.2d 811 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
44 A.D.2d 667, 355 N.Y.S.2d 385, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5218, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-v-wilson-nyappdiv-1974.