Wilson v. Wilson

132 S.E.2d 695, 260 N.C. 347, 1963 N.C. LEXIS 705
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided October 16, 1963·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The order sustaining the demurrer must be affirmed under the authority of Rouse v. Rouse, 258 N.C. 520, 128 S.E. 2d 865. Plaintiff and defendant -began a new period of separation on September 26, 1960, the date of the judgment awarding defendant permanent alimony in her action instituted under G.S. 50-16. Two years thereafter plaintiff was legally entitled to institute this action. A decree of absolute divorce will neither impair hi® liability for alimony under the former judgment nor affect the power of the -court to- enforce it by contempt proceedings or otherwise.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wilson v. Wilson, 132 S.E.2d 695, 260 N.C. 347, 1963 N.C. LEXIS 705 (N.C. 1963).

132 S.E.2d 695 (Wilson v. Wilson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Earles v. Earles
224 S.E.2d 284 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1976)