Wilson v. Wilson
This text of 225 N.E.2d 375 (Wilson v. Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This petition by a husband to revoke a decree for separate support was previously here on his appeal from a decree dismissing the petition, and that decree was reversed. 349 Mass. 29. The petition has now been heard anew and granted by another judge, and the wife has appealed. The evidence is not reported. There is a report of material facts. G. L. c. 215, § 11 (as amended through St. 1947, e. 365, § 3). The report contains much unnecessary verbiage and is not in a form suitable for consideration on appeal. We have discarded the useless rhetoric, and are able “properly to adjudicate the subject matter” on the balance of the report. Accordingly, we do not order a further report under G. L. c. 231, § 125A, inserted by St. 1949, e. 171, § 1, as amended by St. 1963, c. 74, § 2. See Moutinho v. Moutinho, 342 Mass. 171, 173. No error of substance appears.
Decree affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
225 N.E.2d 375, 352 Mass. 767, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-v-wilson-mass-1967.