Wilson v. Wilson
92 S.E. 516, 146 Ga. 805, 1917 Ga. LEXIS 508
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Wilson v. Wilson. Read the opinion of the Court — 142 Ga. 110 →
Opinion
There was no error of law committed on the trial, of sufficient materiality to require a new trial; there was ample evidence to. authorize the verdict; and there was no abuse of discretion in refusing a new trial. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wilson v. Wilson, 92 S.E. 516, 146 Ga. 805, 1917 Ga. LEXIS 508 (Ga. 1917).
92 S.E. 516 (Wilson v. Wilson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.