Wilson v. Wilson

93 So. 3d 1130, 2012 WL 3044274, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 12218
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Wilson v. Wilson. Read the opinion of the Court — 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 5248
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 27, 2012·No. No. 5D11-3806·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Brian Wilson timely appeals, pro se, from a domestic violence injunction issued in favor of his former wife. He argues that his former wife failed to present sufficient evidence to prove stalking, assault or any other crime necessary to warrant an injunction. Although the evidence was insufficient to establish domestic violence by an assault, it was sufficient to prove two other independent grounds for the injunction: domestic violence by stalking and acts giving the former wife reasonable cause to believe she is in imminent danger of becoming a victim of an act of domestic violence. See §§ 741.28(2), (3); 741.3000(a), (e) Fla. Stat. (2011). Accordingly, we affirm the injunction order.

AFFIRMED.

ORFINGER, C.J. and LAWSON and JACOBUS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wilson v. Wilson, 93 So. 3d 1130, 2012 WL 3044274, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 12218 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

93 So. 3d 1130 (Wilson v. Wilson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.