Wilson v. Williams

41 S.E. 629, 115 Ga. 474, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 458
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided April 30, 1902·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Little, J.

When a petition, brought to set aside a judgment foreclosing amaterialman’s lien, and for injunction, etc., showed on its face that the main issue therein raised had, before the filing of such petition, been adjudicated adversely to the petitioner, or could have been properly adjudicated, in a prior case in which both the petitioner and the defendant were parties, it was error to overrule a’demurrer properly presenting the point that the matter in controversy was res adjudicata. Civil Code, § 3742.

An allegation that a particular judgment was void because it was obtained by fraud and collusion between the plaintiff and the defendant therein was cognizable in an equitable proceeding to which one whose property was affected by the judgment, and the plaintiff in the judgment, were both parties.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concurring, except Lewis, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wilson v. Williams, 41 S.E. 629, 115 Ga. 474, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 458 (Ga. 1902).

41 S.E. 629 (Wilson v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Crawford v. Baker
72 S.E.2d 790 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1952)
Johnson v. Hicks
155 S.E. 523 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1930)
Moody v. Williams
122 S.E. 56 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1924)
Conwell v. Neal
45 S.E. 910 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1903)