Wilson v. Williams

41 S.E. 629, 115 Ga. 474, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 458
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedApril 30, 1902
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 41 S.E. 629 (Wilson v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wilson v. Williams, 41 S.E. 629, 115 Ga. 474, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 458 (Ga. 1902).

Opinion

Little, J.

When a petition, brought to set aside a judgment foreclosing amaterialman’s lien, and for injunction, etc., showed on its face that the main issue therein raised had, before the filing of such petition, been adjudicated adversely to the petitioner, or could have been properly adjudicated, in a prior case in which both the petitioner and the defendant were parties, it was error to overrule a’demurrer properly presenting the point that the matter in controversy was res adjudicata. Civil Code, § 3742.

An allegation that a particular judgment was void because it was obtained by fraud and collusion between the plaintiff and the defendant therein was cognizable in an equitable proceeding to which one whose property was affected by the judgment, and the plaintiff in the judgment, were both parties.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concurring, except Lewis, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Crawford v. Baker
72 S.E.2d 790 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1952)
Johnson v. Hicks
155 S.E. 523 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1930)
Moody v. Williams
122 S.E. 56 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1924)
Conwell v. Neal
45 S.E. 910 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1903)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
41 S.E. 629, 115 Ga. 474, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 458, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-v-williams-ga-1902.