Wilson v. Williams
Opinion
The solvency of the plaintiff in replevin does not dispense with the necessity for one or more sureties, for that is a statutory requirement. See cases cited in Wells on Replevin, sec. 390.
The charge of the court was erroneous. Reverse the judgment and remand the cause for a new trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
52 Ark. 360 (Wilson v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.