Wilson v. White
This text of 7 Cow. 477 (Wilson v. White) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
denied the motion, saying it was without pre* cedent ■ and that the circumstances of every party upon the calendar against whom a verdict or report had been ob-. tained, might as well be revised in the same way. We do not allow judgment to go as security, on an affirmative motion against a party, who comes regularly upon the calendar to set aside a verdict or report, on the merits. This is done only where he applies for leave to move upon terms; not right. In all such cases we have power, as one of the terms, if we see that the plaintiff’s safety demands it, to require a condition that judgment or execution should go as security. This is not that case.
Motion denied with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
7 Cow. 477, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-v-white-nysupct-1827.