Wilson v. Wetmore

1 Hill & Den. 216
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 15, 1841
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Hill & Den. 216 (Wilson v. Wetmore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wilson v. Wetmore, 1 Hill & Den. 216 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1841).

Opinion

By the Court, Bronson, J.

The motion must he denied, with costs. Where a party moves on the copy of a writ or other paper, intending to rely on some formal defect or error in the proceeding, he must, either in his affidavit or notice of motion, point out the particular objection on which he intends to rely, to the end that the other party may have a fair opportunity to answer. It is quite possible that the defendant is moving on an erroneous copy of the writ, or that the plaintiff would have had some other good answer to the motion, if he had not been brought here without the slightest intimation of the objection which is now urged against the writ.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Hill & Den. 216, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-v-wetmore-nysupct-1841.