Wilson v. Webster

100 S.E.2d 829, 247 N.C. 393, 1957 N.C. LEXIS 688
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided December 11, 1957·No. 666·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The only assignment of error on this appeal is to the failure of the court below to sustain the defendants’ motion for judgment as of nonsuit.

It would seem that under the provisions of G.S. 20-141 (e) and our decisions, the evidence adduced in the trial below was sufficient to carry the case to the jury. Burchette v. Distributing Co., 243 N.C. 120, 90 S.E. 2d 232; Chaffin v. Brame, 233 N.C. 377, 64 S.E. 2d 276; Boles v. Hegler, 232 N.C. 327, 59 S.E. 2d 796; Cummins v. Fruit Co., 225 N.C. 625, 36 S.E. 2d 11.

The ruling of the court below is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wilson v. Webster, 100 S.E.2d 829, 247 N.C. 393, 1957 N.C. LEXIS 688 (N.C. 1957).

100 S.E.2d 829 (Wilson v. Webster) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Beasley v. Williams
133 S.E.2d 227 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1963)
Dezern v. Asheboro City Board of Education
133 S.E.2d 204 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1963)
Brooks v. Honeycutt
108 S.E.2d 457 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1959)
Hutchins v. Corbett
103 S.E.2d 497 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1958)