Wilson v. Webster
Opinion
The only assignment of error on this appeal is to the failure of the court below to sustain the defendants’ motion for judgment as of nonsuit.
It would seem that under the provisions of G.S. 20-141 (e) and our decisions, the evidence adduced in the trial below was sufficient to carry the case to the jury. Burchette v. Distributing Co., 243 N.C. 120, 90 S.E. 2d 232; Chaffin v. Brame, 233 N.C. 377, 64 S.E. 2d 276; Boles v. Hegler, 232 N.C. 327, 59 S.E. 2d 796; Cummins v. Fruit Co., 225 N.C. 625, 36 S.E. 2d 11.
The ruling of the court below is
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
100 S.E.2d 829 (Wilson v. Webster) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.