Wilson v. Weberling
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-6980
WALTER STEVE WILSON, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
DOUG WEBERLING; BILL PRICE; ZAK LEE; JIM WORLEY; CHRISTEN W. BURHOLDER,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (7:06-cv-00228-JLK)
Submitted: August 31, 2006 Decided: September 8, 2006
Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Walter Steve Wilson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Walter Steve Wilson, Jr., appeals the district court’s
order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Wilson v. Weberling, No. 7:06-cv-00228-JLK (W.D. Va.
Apr. 28, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wilson v. Weberling (Wilson v. Weberling) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.