Wilson v. Watkins

200 P. 292, 23 Ariz. 1, 1921 Ariz. LEXIS 81
Arizona Supreme Court·Decided October 11, 1921·No. Civil No. 1960·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This case is before us, on motion by appellees, to dismiss the appeal, .because the appellant has filed no appeal bond. The facts are in all respects like the facts in Young Construction Co. v. Ruth Gold Mines Co., 14 Ariz. 518, 131 Pac. 1045, and on the authority of that case the motion must be granted. It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wilson v. Watkins, 200 P. 292, 23 Ariz. 1, 1921 Ariz. LEXIS 81 (Ark. 1921).

200 P. 292 (Wilson v. Watkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Young Construction Co. v. Ruth Gold Mines Co.
131 P. 1045 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1913)