Wilson v. Vito
46 A.3d 1284
This text of 46 A.3d 1284 (Wilson v. Vito) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Wilson v. Vito, 46 A.3d 1284 (Pa. 2012).
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 18th day of June, 2012, the order of the Commonwealth Court is [1285]*1285AFFIRMED. The motion filed by Appel-lees, Honeywell, Inc. and Travelers Casualty and Surety Company, for leave of court to file a reply brief pursuant to Pa.R.A.P. 2113 is DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
46 A.3d 1284, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-v-vito-pa-2012.