Wilson v. Virginia
This text of 47 F. App'x 663 (Wilson v. Virginia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Ronald Wilson appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Wilson v. Virginia, No. CA-00-966-7 (W.D.Va. May 6, 2002). We deny Wilson’s motion for appointment of counsel as this matter involves no complex issues or exceptional circumstances. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
47 F. App'x 663, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-v-virginia-ca4-2002.