Wilson v. United States

210 F.2d 245, 45 A.F.T.R. (RIA) 308
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 3, 1954
Docket13819
StatusPublished

This text of 210 F.2d 245 (Wilson v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wilson v. United States, 210 F.2d 245, 45 A.F.T.R. (RIA) 308 (9th Cir. 1954).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Wilson appeals from a judgment convicting him of possession of marihuana not having paid the transfer tax imposed by the Act of Congress of August 2, 1937, the same being the third offense in which he was convicted of violation of that Act.

He contends that there is no evidence to sustain the jury’s verdict. There is no merit in this contention, there being abundant evidence sustaining it.

Wilson further contends that the Act of Congress of November 2, 1951, I.R.C. § 2557(b), 26 U.S.C.A., is unconstitutional because ex post facto in character. This contention was decided by this court adversely to him upon Wilson’s petition for bail pending appeal, as appears in our opinion filed in Wilson v. United States, 9 Cir., 205 F.2d 567.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wilson v. United States
205 F.2d 567 (Ninth Circuit, 1953)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
210 F.2d 245, 45 A.F.T.R. (RIA) 308, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-v-united-states-ca9-1954.