Wilson v. Tremont & Suffolk Mills
This text of 34 N.E. 90 (Wilson v. Tremont & Suffolk Mills) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
For aught that appears, the plaintiff was of full age, and of ordinary intelligence. He had been told how to do the work on which he was engaged at the time of the injury. He had done the identical thing once or twice before which he was attempting to do when hurt. There was no concealed danger nor defect, nor any danger which he could not appreciate. It was perfectly obvious that if he slipped or missed his hold he was liable to fall. We think he must be held to have understood the risk, and to have voluntarily incurred it. The mere fact that the defendant told him to take the cotton from the dryer did not make a concealed danger of that which was obvious before, or render involuntary his assumption of a risk which was incident to and part of his regular work, and which he knew to be such and understood. Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
34 N.E. 90, 159 Mass. 154, 1893 Mass. LEXIS 107, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-v-tremont-suffolk-mills-mass-1893.