Wilson v. Thompson
1 Ohio Ch. 332
Opinion
The replication denies the fact of the plea, and properly concludes to the country. The verification subjoined is surplus-age and a nullity, and so is the rejoinder. The finding, therefore, is upon the substantia] issue; it was acquiesced in at the time without objection, and we incline to hold it good enough after judgment. The judgment is affirmed with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wilson v. Thompson, 1 Ohio Ch. 332 (Ohio 1833).
1 Ohio Ch. 332 (Wilson v. Thompson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.