Wilson v. Thompson

3 N.W. 699, 26 Minn. 299, 1879 Minn. LEXIS 242
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedDecember 11, 1879
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 3 N.W. 699 (Wilson v. Thompson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wilson v. Thompson, 3 N.W. 699, 26 Minn. 299, 1879 Minn. LEXIS 242 (Mich. 1879).

Opinion

. Gileillan, C. J.

Ejectment. Plaintiff claims under an administrator’s sale; defendants under a conveyance by devisees in decedent’s will. The only objection to the sale is to the publication, of notice. The sale was appointed for and took place on November 1, 1877. The first publication of the notice was on October 6th; the second, October 13th; and the third and last, October 20th. The statute (Gen. St. c. 57, § -35,) requires notice of sale in such case to be published “for three weeks successively next before such sale.” It is conceded, and it could not well be disputed, that the three weeks of publication were not complete till October 27th. The objection is that four days elapsed after the three weeks and before the sale; and it is claimed that, to be regular, the sale ought to have been made on the next day after the three weeks. This would be a very narrow construction of the statute, and might lead to serious inconveniences in making such sales. In this case the sale was within the week after the publication became complete, and that-was correct. The true reading of the statute is that there shall be a publication for full three weeks, one in each week next before that in which the sale takes place; in other words, that the sale may be made at any time within the week next after the three weeks of publication are complete.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Watson v. City of Salem
164 P. 567 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1917)
Myakka Co. v. Edwards
68 Fla. 382 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1914)
Hanson v. Nygaard
117 N.W. 235 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1908)
State ex rel. Brown v. Butler
83 N.W. 483 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1900)
State ex rel. Nicolin v. Board of County Commissioners
45 N.W. 614 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1890)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 N.W. 699, 26 Minn. 299, 1879 Minn. LEXIS 242, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-v-thompson-minn-1879.