Wilson v. Suval's Fabrics, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Wilson v. Suval's Fabrics, Inc.

34 A.D.2d 691, 311 N.Y.S.2d 274, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5019

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 27, 1970

StatusPublished

This text of 34 A.D.2d 691 (Wilson v. Suval's Fabrics, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wilson v. Suval's Fabrics, Inc., 34 A.D.2d 691, 311 N.Y.S.2d 274, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5019 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, defendants appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated December 20, 1968, in favor of plaintiff, upon a jury verdict. Judgment reversed, on the law and the facts, and new trial granted, with costs to abide the event, unless, within 30 days after entry of the order hereon, plaintiff shall serve and file a written stipulation consenting to reduce the amount of the verdict in his favor to $7,500 and to the entry of an amended judgment accordingly, in which event the judgment, as so reduced and amended, is affirmed, without costs. In our opinion, the verdict was excessive to the extent indicated. Rabin, Acting P. J., Hopkins, Munder, Martuscello and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, defendants appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated December 20, 1968, in favor of plaintiff, upon a jury verdict. Judgment reversed, on the law and the facts, and new trial granted, with costs to abide the event, unless, within 30 days after entry of the order hereon, plaintiff shall serve and file a written stipulation consenting to reduce the amount of the verdict in his favor to $7,500 and to the entry of an amended judgment accordingly, in which event the judgment, as so reduced and amended, is affirmed, without costs. In our opinion, the verdict was excessive to the extent indicated. Rabin, Acting P. J., Hopkins, Munder, Martuscello and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

34 A.D.2d 691, 311 N.Y.S.2d 274, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5019, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-v-suvals-fabrics-inc-nyappdiv-1970.